NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs K2200
Comparison of Quadro 6000 and Quadro K2200 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro 6000 and Quadro K2200's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro 6000 and Quadro K2200's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
32.14 GTexel / s
44.96 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro 6000 and Quadro K2200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro 6000 and Quadro K2200: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
143.4 GB / s
80.19 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro 6000 and Quadro K2200.
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
APIs supported by Quadro 6000 and Quadro K2200, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro 6000 and Quadro K2200. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Quadro 6000 16.21
Quadro K2200 17.32 +6.8%
Quadro 6000 3531
Quadro K2200 3650 +3.4%
Octane Render OctaneBench
Quadro 6000 40 +29%
Quadro K2200 31
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro 6000 and Quadro K2200. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
91 Mh/s −78%
162 Mh/s +78%
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
Let's see how good Quadro 6000 and Quadro K2200 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Wider memory bus (384 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (143.4 vs 80.19 GB/s)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2200
6.8% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (22 July 2014 vs 10 December 2010)
Cheaper ($395.75 vs $4399)
More pipelines (640 vs 448)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)
Less power hungry (68 vs 204 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
So, Quadro 6000 or K2200?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro 6000 and Quadro K2200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.