Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs Quadro K2100M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking723not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.63no data
Power efficiency4.46no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGK106Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$84.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576640
Core clock speed667 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0258.00
Floating-point processing power0.7684 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs4840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed752 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth48.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU has an age advantage of 9 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K2100M and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Quadro K2100M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 279 votes

Rate Quadro K2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 160 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.