GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs Quadro K1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1200 with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K1200
2015
4 GB 128-bit, 45 Watt
7.65

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms K1200 by a whopping 504% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.94no data
Power efficiency11.6927.63
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM107GA104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 January 2015 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$321.97 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5125632
Core clock speed1058 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate35.97248.2
Floating-point processing power1.151 TFLOPS15.88 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs32176
Tensor Coresno data176
Ray Tracing Coresno data44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length160 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.08.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K1200 7.65
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 46.21
+504%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K1200 2949
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 17804
+504%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
−572%
121
+572%
1440p10−12
−620%
72
+620%
4K8−9
−513%
49
+513%

Cost per frame, $

1080p17.89no data
1440p32.20no data
4K40.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 129
+0%
129
+0%
Atomic Heart 158
+0%
158
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 111
+0%
111
+0%
Far Cry 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+0%
133
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Atomic Heart 95
+0%
95
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 89
+0%
89
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+0%
188
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 193
+0%
193
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 53
+0%
53
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Atomic Heart 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how Quadro K1200 and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 572% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 620% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 513% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.65 46.21
Recency 28 January 2015 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 115 Watt

Quadro K1200 has 155.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 504.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1200 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1
104 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4
908 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1200 or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.