Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Quadro K1200

Place in the ranking	531	51
Place by popularity	not in top-100	95
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.88	56.83
Power efficiency	11.73	15.45
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GM107	Navi 22
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 January 2015 (10 years ago)	3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$321.97	$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 XT has 1873% better value for money than Quadro K1200.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2560
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	35.97	413.0
Floating-point processing power	1.151 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	32	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	160 mm	267 mm
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 80 GB/s	384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	5.0	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K1200 7.67

RX 6700 XT 51.62
+573%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K1200 2947

RX 6700 XT 19838
+573%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21−24 −633%	154 +633%
1440p	12−14 −600%	84 +600%
4K	7−8 −600%	49 +600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	15.33 −393%	3.11 +393%
1440p	26.83 −371%	5.70 +371%
4K	46.00 −371%	9.78 +371%

RX 6700 XT has 393% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 6700 XT has 371% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 6700 XT has 371% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	159 +0%	159 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	119 +0%	119 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	123 +0%	123 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	104 +0%	104 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	342 +0%	342 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	131 +0%	131 +0%
Metro Exodus	150 +0%	150 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	104 +0%	104 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	91 +0%	91 +0%
Dota 2	166 +0%	166 +0%
Far Cry 5	61 +0%	61 +0%
Fortnite	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	281 +0%	281 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	145 +0%	145 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	161 +0%	161 +0%
Metro Exodus	117 +0%	117 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	91 +0%	91 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	82 +0%	82 +0%
Dota 2	139 +0%	139 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240 +0%	240 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	117 +0%	117 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Dota 2	102 +0%	102 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	102 +0%	102 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
World of Tanks	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 +0%	54 +0%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	173 +0%	173 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	94 +0%	94 +0%
Metro Exodus	123 +0%	123 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Dota 2	102 +0%	102 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	102 +0%	102 +0%
Metro Exodus	43 +0%	43 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	102 +0%	102 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10 +0%	10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +0%	24 +0%
Dota 2	106 +0%	106 +0%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Fortnite	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	93 +0%	93 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

This is how Quadro K1200 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6700 XT is 633% faster in 1080p
RX 6700 XT is 600% faster in 1440p
RX 6700 XT is 600% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.67	51.62
Recency	28 January 2015	3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	230 Watt

Quadro K1200 has 411.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 573% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.