Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Quadro K1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5900 5900 XT 5950 5950 XT 6800 6800 3456SP 6800 XT 6850 XT 6900 6900 XT 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1200 with Radeon RX 6800 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K1200
2015, $322
4 GB 128-bit, 45 Watt
7.09

6800 XT outperforms K1200 by a whopping 743% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking58844
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.1743.40
Power efficiency12.1015.30
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (10 years ago)28 October 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$321.97 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6800 XT has 3609% better value for money than Quadro K1200.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124608
Core clock speed954 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06648.0
Floating-point processing power1.0578 TFLOPS20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs32288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L0 Cacheno data1.1 MB
L1 Cache256 KB1 MB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length160 mm267 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.21x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K1200 7.09
RX 6800 XT 59.77
+743%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K1200 2964
Samples: 726
RX 6800 XT 24998
+743%
Samples: 6861

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−829%
195
+829%
1440p16−18
−763%
138
+763%
4K10−12
−820%
92
+820%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.33
−361%
3.33
+361%
1440p20.12
−328%
4.70
+328%
4K32.20
−356%
7.05
+356%
  • RX 6800 XT has 361% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT has 328% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT has 356% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 191
+0%
191
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 143
+0%
143
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 183
+0%
183
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Dota 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Far Cry 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+0%
150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 152
+0%
152
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294
+0%
294
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 175
+0%
175
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160
+0%
160
+0%
Valorant 356
+0%
356
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 154
+0%
154
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
+0%
110
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Quadro K1200 and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 829% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 763% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 820% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.09 59.77
Recency 28 January 2015 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro K1200 has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 743% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
GRID K260Q GRID K260Q
RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
L40S L40S
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
9600 GTX GeForce 9600 GTX
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
Pro V340 Pro V340
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G1 Graphics Xe G1
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
RX 6950 XT RX 6950 XT
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT
Tesla K8 Tesla K8
vs
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 120 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4374 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1200 or Radeon RX 6800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.