FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K1200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro K1200
2015
4GB 128-bit
7.53
+0.8%

Quadro K1200 outperforms FirePro W4300 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking494495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money4.814.55
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGM107Bonaire
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 January 2015 (9 years old)1 December 2015 (8 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$321.97 no data
Current price$124 (0.4x MSRP)$129
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K1200 has 6% better value for money than FirePro W4300.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed1058 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate35.9744.64
Floating-point performance1,151 gflops1,428 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length160 mm171 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80 GB/s96 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsmDP mDP mDP mDP4x mini-DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model56.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K1200 7.53
+0.8%
FirePro W4300 7.47

Quadro K1200 outperforms FirePro W4300 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K1200 2916
+0.8%
FirePro W4300 2894

Quadro K1200 outperforms FirePro W4300 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 7.53 7.47
Recency 28 January 2015 1 December 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 50 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro K1200 and FirePro W4300.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200
AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 84 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 16 votes

Rate AMD FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.