Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with Radeon RX 6500 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018, $8,999
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
45.15
+96%

GV100 outperforms 6500 XT by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking94270
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.1747.08
Power efficiency13.9116.57
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGV100Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 March 2018 (8 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6500 XT has 3924% better value for money than Quadro GV100.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201024
Core clock speed1132 MHz2610 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz2815 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt107 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6180.2
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS5.765 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs32064
Tensor Cores640no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache10 MB256 KB
L2 Cache6 MB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz2248 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s143.9 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro GV100 45.15
+96%
RX 6500 XT 23.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GV100 18623
+93.4%
Samples: 40
RX 6500 XT 9629
Samples: 3101

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+90.5%
63
−90.5%
1440p60−65
+93.5%
31
−93.5%
4K30−35
+76.5%
17
−76.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p74.99
−2274%
3.16
+2274%
1440p149.98
−2236%
6.42
+2236%
4K299.97
−2463%
11.71
+2463%
  • RX 6500 XT has 2274% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6500 XT has 2236% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6500 XT has 2463% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 281
+0%
281
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 72
+0%
72
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 77
+0%
77
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 194
+0%
194
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 52
+0%
52
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 18
+0%
18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
+0%
34
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+0%
4
+0%
Dota 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how Quadro GV100 and RX 6500 XT compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 90% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GV100 is 94% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro GV100 is 76% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.15 23.03
Recency 27 March 2018 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 107 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 96% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6500 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 134% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6500 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 55 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 3930 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GV100 or Radeon RX 6500 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.