Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Quadro GV100

Place in performance ranking	47	24
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.69	28.09
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GV100	Navi 21
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 March 2018 (6 years ago)	18 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$8,999	$649
Current price	$5183 (0.6x MSRP)	$696 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6800 XT has 499% better value for money than Quadro GV100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	4608
Core clock speed	1132 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	1627 MHz	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	520.6	648.0
Floating-point performance	14,817 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1696 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	868.4 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro GV100 51.33

RX 6800 XT 64.81
+26.3%

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms Quadro GV100 by 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro GV100 19824

RX 6800 XT 25032
+26.3%

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms Quadro GV100 by 26% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	160−170 −28.8%	206 +28.8%
1440p	100−110 −38%	138 +38%
4K	70−75 −30%	91 +30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

95−100
−31.6%

120−130

+31.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 −30%	100−110 +30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 −31.7%	158 +31.7%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −28.8%	200−210 +28.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 −28.9%	110−120 +28.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 −31.6%	120−130 +31.6%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −27.8%	110−120 +27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −30.8%	150−160 +30.8%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −28.8%	200−210 +28.8%
Hitman 3	100−105 −32%	132 +32%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 −44%	432 +44%
Metro Exodus	110−120 −30.9%	144 +30.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 −28.4%	122 +28.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 −34.7%	404 +34.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −30%	169 +30%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 −30%	100−110 +30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −35%	135 +35%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −28.8%	200−210 +28.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 −28.9%	110−120 +28.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 −31.6%	120−130 +31.6%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −27.8%	110−120 +27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −30.8%	150−160 +30.8%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −28.8%	200−210 +28.8%
Hitman 3	50−55 −36%	68 +36%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 −30%	270−280 +30%
Metro Exodus	100−105 −34%	134 +34%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 −27.4%	121 +27.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	280−290 −26.8%	355 +26.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	230−240 −27.8%	294 +27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 −28.8%	309 +28.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 −30%	100−110 +30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −31.1%	118 +31.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 −28.9%	110−120 +28.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 −31.6%	120−130 +31.6%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −27.8%	110−120 +27.8%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −28.8%	200−210 +28.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 −26.8%	279 +26.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	230−240 −31.3%	302 +31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −33.3%	160 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −31.8%	112 +31.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
−26.3%

120

+26.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −35.5%	140−150 +35.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 −30%	143 +30%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −36.4%	75−80 +36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 −30.7%	98 +30.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −34.7%	100−110 +34.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −32%	65−70 +32%
Far Cry 5	100−105 −31%	131 +31%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −26.7%	150−160 +26.7%
Hitman 3	90−95 −26.7%	114 +26.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −26.5%	215 +26.5%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −31.8%	112 +31.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 −30.6%	222 +30.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 −26.7%	110−120 +26.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −30.8%	85 +30.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
−28.9%

116

+28.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −30%	75−80 +30%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −28%	60−65 +28%
Hitman 3	40−45 −40%	55−60 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −29.3%	95−100 +29.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −33.3%	80 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −29.4%	110 +29.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −30%	50−55 +30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −30%	65 +30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −34.3%	45−50 +34.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −29.2%	30−35 +29.2%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −32.5%	100−110 +32.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −28%	128 +28%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −34.3%	94 +34.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −40%	49 +40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

−26.7%

76
+26.7%

This is how Quadro GV100 and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is 29% faster in 1080p
RX 6800 XT is 38% faster in 1440p
RX 6800 XT is 30% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	51.33	64.81
Recency	27 March 2018	18 November 2020
Cost	$8999	$649
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	300 Watt