Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Quadro GV100

Place in performance ranking	47	46
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.72	23.18
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GV100	Navi 22
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 March 2018 (6 years ago)	3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$8,999	$479
Current price	$5183 (0.6x MSRP)	$685 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 XT has 391% better value for money than Quadro GV100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	2560
Core clock speed	1132 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	1627 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	520.6	413.0
Floating-point performance	14,817 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1696 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	868.4 GB/s	384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro GV100 51.33

RX 6700 XT 51.49
+0.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro GV100 19824

RX 6700 XT 19885
+0.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	150−160 −0.7%	151 +0.7%
1440p	85−90 −1.2%	86 +1.2%
4K	45−50 −11.1%	50 +11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

110−120

−8.2%

119
+8.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	160−170 −5.6%	169 +5.6%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −2.5%	160−170 +2.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 −5.3%	100−105 +5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 −4.2%	99 +4.2%
Far Cry 5	100−105 −3%	100−110 +3%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −4.2%	120−130 +4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −4.1%	170−180 +4.1%
Hitman 3	130−140 −6.2%	138 +6.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 −2.6%	359 +2.6%
Metro Exodus	120−130 −8.3%	130−140 +8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 −14%	342 +14%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −3.6%	110−120 +3.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 −2.9%	144 +2.9%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −2.5%	160−170 +2.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 −5.3%	100−105 +5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 −5.9%	90 +5.9%
Far Cry 5	100−105 −3%	100−110 +3%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −4.2%	120−130 +4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −4.1%	170−180 +4.1%
Hitman 3	110−120 −0.9%	111 +0.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 −1.4%	210−220 +1.4%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −4.3%	73 +4.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	280−290 −0.4%	281 +0.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	220−230 −1.4%	223 +1.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −3.6%	110−120 +3.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 −4.2%	125 +4.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 −5.3%	100−105 +5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 −6.3%	85 +6.3%
Far Cry 5	100−105 −3%	100−110 +3%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −4.1%	170−180 +4.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 −1.6%	193 +1.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	230−240 −4.3%	240 +4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −5.8%	127 +5.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −5%	84 +5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−0.9%

110−120
+0.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 −6%	100−110 +6%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −3.6%	55−60 +3.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −9%	109 +9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −2.5%	80−85 +2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −1.8%	56 +1.8%
Far Cry 5	130−140 −5.4%	137 +5.4%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −2.7%	110−120 +2.7%
Hitman 3	80−85 −3.8%	83 +3.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −3.6%	145 +3.6%
Metro Exodus	120−130 −2.5%	123 +2.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 −1.8%	173 +1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −3.8%	80−85 +3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −3.3%	62 +3.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90

−4.7%

85−90
+4.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −10%	55−60 +10%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −4.4%	45−50 +4.4%
Hitman 3	45−50 −6.7%	48 +6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −1.4%	70−75 +1.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −3.6%	57 +3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −5.7%	74 +5.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −8.6%	35−40 +8.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 −6.7%	48 +6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −4.2%	25 +4.2%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −10%	30−35 +10%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −1.3%	75−80 +1.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −3.8%	83 +3.8%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −1.3%	76 +1.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −16.7%	35 +16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

−8.9%

45−50
+8.9%

This is how Quadro GV100 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6700 XT is 1% faster in 1080p
RX 6700 XT is 1% faster in 1440p
RX 6700 XT is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	51.33	51.49
Recency	27 March 2018	3 March 2021
Cost	$8999	$479
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	230 Watt