Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Quadro FX Go1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FX 350M FX 550M FX 1500M FX 2500M FX 3500M FX Go540 FX Go1400 NVS 110M NVS 120M NVS 300M NVS 510M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX Go1400 and Quadro T1200 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FX Go1400
2005
256 MB DDR
0.24

T1200 Mobile outperforms Go1400 by a whopping 7088% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX Go1400 FX Go1400
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1424347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data73.91
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV41TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date25 February 2005 (20 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed275 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors222 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate2.20091.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs864
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed295 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth18.88 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−158
1440p-0−133
4K1−2
−8000%
81
+8000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how FX Go1400 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 8000% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 50 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.24 17.25
Recency 25 February 2005 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm

T1200 Mobile has a 7087.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX Go1400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
Quadro FX Go1400
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX Go1400 Quadro FX Go1400
vs
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 Mobility FireGL V5700
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
FX Go1400 Quadro FX Go1400
vs
FX Go 1400 Quadro FX Go 1400
FX Go1400 NVIDIA FX Go1400
vs
T1000 Mobile T1000 Mobile
FX Go1400 NVIDIA FX Go1400
vs
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q
FX Go1400 NVIDIA FX Go1400
vs
T1000 Max-Q T1000 Max-Q
FX Go1400 NVIDIA FX Go1400
vs
T400 Mobile T400 Mobile
FX Go1400 NVIDIA FX Go1400
vs
T600 Mobile T600 Mobile
FX Go1400 NVIDIA FX Go1400
vs
T550 Mobile Mobile
Quadro4 700 Go GL Quadro4 700 Go GL
vs
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
GeForce 945M 945M
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
ATI HD 5850 5850
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
4000 Mac Edition 4000 Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX Go1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 159 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX Go1400 or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.