GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Quadro FX 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 5800 with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, including specs and performance data.

FX 5800
2008
4 GB GDDR3, 189 Watt
3.17

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms FX 5800 by a whopping 2490% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking7156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.6530.38
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGT200BAD103-275
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 November 2008 (15 years ago)24 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,499 $799
Current price$157 (0x MSRP)$820 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 4574% better value for money than FX 5800.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2408448
Core clock speed610 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)189 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate48.80689.0
Floating-point performance622.1 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm310 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s716.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.38.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 5800 3.17
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.10
+2490%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms Quadro FX 5800 by 2490% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 5800 1223
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31703
+2492%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms Quadro FX 5800 by 2492% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−2600%
216
+2600%
1440p5−6
−2900%
150
+2900%
4K3−4
−2967%
92
+2967%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
−2457%
3350−3400
+2457%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
−2484%
3850−3900
+2484%
Battlefield 5 240−250
−2482%
6300−6350
+2482%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−2483%
3100−3150
+2483%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−2485%
3050−3100
+2485%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
−2487%
5200−5250
+2487%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
−2490%
6500−6550
+2490%
Hitman 3 120−130
−2461%
3150−3200
+2461%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
−2479%
8950−9000
+2479%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−2484%
3850−3900
+2484%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−2481%
3200−3250
+2481%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 467
−2480%
12050−12100
+2480%
Watch Dogs: Legion 171
−2473%
4400−4450
+2473%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
−2457%
3350−3400
+2457%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
−2484%
3850−3900
+2484%
Battlefield 5 240−250
−2482%
6300−6350
+2482%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−2483%
3100−3150
+2483%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−2485%
3050−3100
+2485%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
−2487%
5200−5250
+2487%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
−2490%
6500−6550
+2490%
Hitman 3 120−130
−2461%
3150−3200
+2461%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
−2479%
8950−9000
+2479%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−2484%
3850−3900
+2484%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−2481%
3200−3250
+2481%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 442
−2479%
11400−11450
+2479%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 430
−2481%
11100−11150
+2481%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−2486%
3750−3800
+2486%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
−2457%
3350−3400
+2457%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
−2484%
3850−3900
+2484%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−2483%
3100−3150
+2483%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−2485%
3050−3100
+2485%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
−2490%
6500−6550
+2490%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
−2479%
8950−9000
+2479%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 407
−2480%
10500−10550
+2480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 210
−2471%
5400−5450
+2471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 144
−2469%
3700−3750
+2469%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−2481%
3200−3250
+2481%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
−2460%
4250−4300
+2460%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−2469%
3700−3750
+2469%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
−2476%
2550−2600
+2476%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
−2446%
2750−2800
+2446%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−2489%
2900−2950
+2489%
Far Cry 5 187
−2467%
4800−4850
+2467%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−2471%
5450−5500
+2471%
Hitman 3 120−130
−2483%
3100−3150
+2483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−2478%
5750−5800
+2478%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−2478%
3300−3350
+2478%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 306
−2482%
7900−7950
+2482%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
−2479%
4100−4150
+2479%
Watch Dogs: Legion 116
−2486%
3000−3050
+2486%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−2479%
3250−3300
+2479%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−2457%
2250−2300
+2457%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−2436%
1750−1800
+2436%
Hitman 3 75−80
−2466%
1950−2000
+2466%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−2474%
3500−3550
+2474%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110
−2445%
2800−2850
+2445%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
−2457%
3350−3400
+2457%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−2469%
1850−1900
+2469%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−2436%
1750−1800
+2436%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−2400%
1300−1350
+2400%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−2400%
1250−1300
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−2476%
4250−4300
+2476%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−2474%
3500−3550
+2474%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−2474%
2600−2650
+2474%
Watch Dogs: Legion 69
−2436%
1750−1800
+2436%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−2476%
2550−2600
+2476%

This is how FX 5800 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 2600% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 2900% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 2967% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.17 82.10
Recency 11 November 2008 24 January 2024
Cost $3499 $799
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 189 Watt 285 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5800 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Quadro FX 5800
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 27 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1429 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.