GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Quadro FX 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro CX Quadro FX 3800 Quadro FX 4800 Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition Quadro FX 5800 Quadro Plex 2200 D2 Tesla C1060 Tesla C1080 Tesla M1060 Tesla S1070 Tesla S1075 Tesla T10 Processor
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 3050 A Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 5800 with GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FX 5800
2008
4 GB GDDR3, 189 Watt
3.14

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms FX 5800 by a whopping 729% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FX 5800 FX 5800
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile RTX 3050 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking760220
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency1.1524.09
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGT200BGA106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 November 2008 (16 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2402560
Core clock speed610 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1035 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)189 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate48.8082.80
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs8080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.38.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 5800 3.14
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.03
+729%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5800 1221
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10127
+729%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−744%
76
+744%
1440p5−6
−760%
43
+760%
4K3−4
−833%
28
+833%

Cost per frame, $

1080p388.78no data
1440p699.80no data
4K1166.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 94
+0%
94
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 71
+0%
71
+0%
Battlefield 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 87
+0%
87
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 42
+0%
42
+0%
Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Dota 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 112
+0%
112
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 34
+0%
34
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+0%
29
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how FX 5800 and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 744% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 760% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 833% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.14 26.03
Recency 11 November 2008 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 189 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has a 729% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 152% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5800 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Quadro FX 5800
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 5800 Quadro FX 5800
vs
NVS 810 NVS 810
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1080 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
FX 5800 Quadro FX 5800
vs
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
ATI 7500 ATI Radeon 7500
vs
ATI DDR VIVO DDR VIVO
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
vs
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT
FX 4700 X2 NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
vs
RTX 2070 RTX 2070
ATI Mobility HD 5650 ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
vs
RTX 4070 RTX 4070
Tegra X1 NVIDIA Tegra X1
vs
RTX 3070 16 GB RTX 3070 16 GB
GTX 960M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Plus Graphics G4
GTX 960M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Plus Graphics G7
Vega 11 Embedded AMD Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
ATI 9700 PRO Radeon 9700 PRO
GTX 780M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
vs
GeForce 920MX GeForce 920MX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 27 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4364 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 5800 or GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.