GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Quadro FX 3800

Place in performance ranking	831	198
Place by popularity	not in top-100	71
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.21	no data
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GT200B	GN20-P1
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	30 March 2009 (15 years ago)	10 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	no data
Current price	$171 (0.2x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	2560
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1222 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	38.40	118.8
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 3800 and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	198 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	1.3	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	6−7 −1150%	75 +1150%
1440p	3−4 −1300%	42 +1300%
4K	2−3 −1200%	26 +1200%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.06	24.97
Recency	30 March 2009	10 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	60 Watt