Quadro K420 vs FX 4600

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX 4600
2007
768 MB GDDR3
1.11

K420 outperforms FX 4600 by 73% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1043862
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.040.08
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG80GK107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 March 2007 (17 years ago)22 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 $96.67
Current price$179 (0.1x MSRP)$402 (4.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K420 has 100% better value for money than FX 4600.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96192
Core clock speed500 MHz876 MHz
Number of transistors681 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt41 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0014.02
Floating-point performance230.4 gflops336.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm160 mm
Width2-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount768 MB1 GB/2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/sUp to 29 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoDVI-I DP
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12
Shader Model4.05
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A+
CUDA+3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 4600 1.11
Quadro K420 1.92
+73%

K420 outperforms FX 4600 by 73% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 4600 430
Quadro K420 745
+73.3%

K420 outperforms FX 4600 by 73% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.11 1.92
Recency 5 March 2007 22 July 2014
Cost $1999 $96.67
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 1 GB/2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 41 Watt

The Quadro K420 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Quadro FX 4600
NVIDIA Quadro K420
Quadro K420

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 138 votes

Rate Quadro K420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.