Quadro FX 4600 vs FX 3700

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX 3700
2008
512 MB GDDR3
0.97

FX 4600 outperforms FX 3700 by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking10721041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.020.04
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG92G80
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date8 January 2008 (16 years old)5 March 2007 (17 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $1,999
Current price$256 (0.2x MSRP)$179 (0.1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 4600 has 100% better value for money than FX 3700.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11296
Core clock speed500 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors754 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt134 Watt
Texture fill rate28.0024.00
Floating-point performance280 gflops230.4 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB768 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s67.2 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 3700 0.97
FX 4600 1.11
+14.4%

FX 4600 outperforms FX 3700 by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 3700 377
FX 4600 430
+14.1%

FX 4600 outperforms FX 3700 by 14% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.97 1.11
Recency 8 January 2008 5 March 2007
Cost $1599 $1999
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 768 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 134 Watt

The Quadro FX 4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Quadro FX 3700
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Quadro FX 4600

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 19 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.