Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs Quadro FX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 4000 with Radeon RX 580 2048SP, including specs and performance data.

FX 4000
2004
256 MB GDDR3, 142 Watt
0.24

RX 580 2048SP outperforms FX 4000 by a whopping 7508% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1404320
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Power efficiency0.139.27
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV40Polaris 20
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 April 2004 (21 years ago)15 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed375 MHz1168 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1284 MHz
Number of transistors222 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.500164.4
Floating-point processing powerno data5.259 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs12128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x Molex1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 4000 0.24
RX 580 2048SP 18.26
+7508%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 4000 101
RX 580 2048SP 7650
+7474%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.24 18.26
Recency 1 April 2004 15 October 2018
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 150 Watt

FX 4000 has 5.6% lower power consumption.

RX 580 2048SP, on the other hand, has a 7508.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 580 2048SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
Quadro FX 4000
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Radeon RX 580 2048SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 22 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3962 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 2048SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4000 or Radeon RX 580 2048SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.