Radeon RX 7900 XT vs Quadro FX 3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3800 with Radeon RX 7900 XT, including specs and performance data.

FX 3800
2009
1 GB GDDR3, 108 Watt
2.06

RX 7900 XT outperforms FX 3800 by a whopping 3527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking83612
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2225.44
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 3
GPU code nameGT200BNavi 31 XT
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)3 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 $899
Current price$171 (0.2x MSRP)$884 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7900 XT has 11464% better value for money than FX 3800.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925376
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt315 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40804.4
Floating-point performance462.3 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length198 mm276 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 3800 2.06
RX 7900 XT 74.72
+3527%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms Quadro FX 3800 by 3527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 3800 797
RX 7900 XT 28855
+3520%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms Quadro FX 3800 by 3520% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−4020%
206
+4020%
1440p3−4
−4500%
138
+4500%
4K2−3
−4500%
92
+4500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 237
−3508%
8550−8600
+3508%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−3513%
4300−4350
+3513%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
−3498%
4750−4800
+3498%
Battlefield 5 240−250
−3510%
8700−8750
+3510%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−3525%
4350−4400
+3525%
Cyberpunk 2077 212
−3508%
7650−7700
+3508%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−3502%
4250−4300
+3502%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
−3522%
6700−6750
+3522%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−3509%
8300−8350
+3509%
Hitman 3 120−130
−3518%
4450−4500
+3518%
Horizon Zero Dawn 484
−3526%
17550−17600
+3526%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−3496%
5250−5300
+3496%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−3489%
4450−4500
+3489%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 580
−3521%
21000−21050
+3521%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−3497%
5000−5050
+3497%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−3513%
4300−4350
+3513%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
−3498%
4750−4800
+3498%
Battlefield 5 240−250
−3510%
8700−8750
+3510%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−3525%
4350−4400
+3525%
Cyberpunk 2077 190
−3505%
6850−6900
+3505%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−3502%
4250−4300
+3502%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
−3522%
6700−6750
+3522%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−3509%
8300−8350
+3509%
Hitman 3 120−130
−3518%
4450−4500
+3518%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
−3523%
11450−11500
+3523%
Metro Exodus 79
−3508%
2850−2900
+3508%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−3489%
4450−4500
+3489%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 492
−3518%
17800−17850
+3518%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 483
−3523%
17500−17550
+3523%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−3497%
5000−5050
+3497%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−3513%
4300−4350
+3513%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
−3498%
4750−4800
+3498%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−3525%
4350−4400
+3525%
Cyberpunk 2077 179
−3503%
6450−6500
+3503%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−3502%
4250−4300
+3502%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−3509%
8300−8350
+3509%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350
−3514%
12650−12700
+3514%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 424
−3520%
15350−15400
+3520%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 265
−3523%
9600−9650
+3523%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−3497%
5000−5050
+3497%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−3489%
4450−4500
+3489%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
−3514%
6000−6050
+3514%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−3511%
5200−5250
+3511%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
−3480%
3150−3200
+3480%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
−3479%
3400−3450
+3479%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−3491%
3950−4000
+3491%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
−3507%
4400−4450
+3507%
Far Cry 5 173
−3513%
6250−6300
+3513%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−3522%
6700−6750
+3522%
Hitman 3 110−120
−3491%
3950−4000
+3491%
Horizon Zero Dawn 277
−3510%
10000−10050
+3510%
Metro Exodus 141
−3517%
5100−5150
+3517%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 325
−3515%
11750−11800
+3515%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
−3497%
5000−5050
+3497%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−3488%
3050−3100
+3488%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−3525%
4350−4400
+3525%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−3480%
3150−3200
+3480%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−3523%
2500−2550
+3523%
Hitman 3 65−70
−3482%
2400−2450
+3482%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−3502%
4250−4300
+3502%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110
−3491%
3950−4000
+3491%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
−3516%
5750−5800
+3516%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−3494%
2300−2350
+3494%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−3483%
2150−2200
+3483%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−3458%
1850−1900
+3458%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
−3483%
2150−2200
+3483%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−3500%
1800−1850
+3500%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−3513%
4950−5000
+3513%
Horizon Zero Dawn 166
−3514%
6000−6050
+3514%
Metro Exodus 129
−3505%
4650−4700
+3505%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−3500%
1800−1850
+3500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−3471%
3000−3050
+3471%

This is how FX 3800 and RX 7900 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XT is 4020% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XT is 4500% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XT is 4500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.06 74.72
Recency 30 March 2009 3 November 2022
Cost $799 $899
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 315 Watt

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Quadro FX 3800
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 48 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1459 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.