Matrox G450 x4 MMS vs Quadro FX 3700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1183not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.88no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameG92Condor
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 January 2008 (17 years ago)1 January 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112no data
Core clock speed500 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors754 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)78 Wattno data
Texture fill rate28.000.25
Floating-point processing power0.28 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs562
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length267 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3None
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2008 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm

FX 3700 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3700 and Matrox G450 x4 MMS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3700 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox G450 x4 MMS is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Quadro FX 3700
Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3700 or Matrox G450 x4 MMS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.