Radeon RX 5700 vs Quadro Plex 2200 S4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated166
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.29
Power efficiencyno data14.59
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGT200BNavi 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)7 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240 ×42304
Core clock speed648 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate51.84 ×4248.4
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS ×47.949 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×464
TMUs80 ×4144
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length522 mm268 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×48 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×4256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s ×4448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 180 Watt

RX 5700 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 685.7% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro Plex 2200 S4 and Radeon RX 5700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro Plex 2200 S4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2279 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro Plex 2200 S4 or Radeon RX 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.