Quadro FX 3000G vs Matrox G450 x4 MMS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameCondorNV35
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 January 2001 (24 years ago)22 July 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed125 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors10 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate0.253.200
ROPs24
TMUs28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 8x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed332 MBps425 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s27.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.09.0a
OpenGLNone1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLNoneN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2001 22 July 2003
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 130 nm

FX 3000G has an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox G450 x4 MMS and Quadro FX 3000G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox G450 x4 MMS is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 3000G is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000G
Quadro FX 3000G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox G450 x4 MMS or Quadro FX 3000G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.