Matrox G450 x4 MMS vs Quadro FX 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1474not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameNV35Condor
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2003 (22 years ago)1 January 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$203 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors135 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate3.2000.25
ROPs42
TMUs82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a6.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)None
OpenCLN/ANone
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2003 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 180 nm

FX 3000 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3000 and Matrox G450 x4 MMS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3000 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox G450 x4 MMS is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Quadro FX 3000
Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3000 or Matrox G450 x4 MMS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.