UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs Quadro FX 3600M

Place in performance ranking	1016	817
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.15	no data
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code name	NB8E-GLM	Gen. 11
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	23 February 2008 (16 years ago)	11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$80	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	24
Core clock speed	500 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	800 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.00	no data
Floating-point performance	160 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 3600M and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-HE	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	51.14 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12_1
Shader Model	4.0	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data
CUDA	1.1	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

6−7

−100%

12
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Hitman 3	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −100%	12 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Hitman 3	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −100%	8 +100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−150%

5−6
+150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%