ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs Quadro FX 1600M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro FX 1600M and Mobility FireGL V5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
FX 1600M outperforms ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1223 | 1310 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.03 | no data |
Power efficiency | 0.82 | no data |
Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
GPU code name | G84 | M86 |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 June 2007 (17 years ago) | 7 January 2008 (17 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149.90 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 120 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 600 MHz |
Number of transistors | 289 million | 378 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 10.00 | 4.800 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.08 TFLOPS | 0.144 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 8 | 4 |
TMUs | 16 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 22.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+7.7%
|
24−27
−7.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 18−20
+28.6%
|
14−16
−28.6%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+7.7%
|
24−27
−7.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+7.7%
|
24−27
−7.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the FX 1600M is 100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- FX 1600M is ahead in 15 tests (48%)
- there's a draw in 16 tests (52%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.52 | 0.30 |
Recency | 1 June 2007 | 7 January 2008 |
Chip lithography | 80 nm | 55 nm |
FX 1600M has a 73.3% higher aggregate performance score.
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro FX 1600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility FireGL V5700 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.