GeForce 6100 vs Quadro FX 1500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 1500M with GeForce 6100, including specs and performance data.

FX 1500M
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.39
+550%

1500M outperforms 6100 by a whopping 550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13041523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.70no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG71C51
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date18 April 2006 (19 years ago)11 October 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores27no data
Core clock speed375 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate9.0000.43
ROPs161
TMUs241

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model3.03.0
OpenGL2.12.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 1500M 0.39
+550%
GeForce 6100 0.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1500M 171
+533%
Samples: 26
GeForce 6100 27
Samples: 136

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Valorant 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Valorant 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 0.06
Recency 18 April 2006 11 October 2004

FX 1500M has a 550% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Quadro FX 1500M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 6100 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
Quadro FX 1500M
NVIDIA GeForce 6100
GeForce 6100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 1500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 63 votes

Rate GeForce 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1500M or GeForce 6100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.