Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce 8700M GT

Place in the ranking	1308	665
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.76	20.34
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	G84	Coffee Lake GT3e
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2007 (17 years ago)	7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	384
Core clock speed	625 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1050 MHz
Number of transistors	289 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	29 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.00	50.40
Floating-point processing power	0.08 TFLOPS	0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	6
TMUs	16	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-HE	Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8700M GT 0.32

Iris Plus Graphics 645 4.45
+1291%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8700M GT 124

Iris Plus Graphics 645 1716
+1284%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

1−2

−2500%

26
+2500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−250%

7−8
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Hitman 3	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −53.6%	40−45 +53.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Hitman 3	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −53.6%	40−45 +53.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Hitman 3	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −53.6%	40−45 +53.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	2−3
Hitman 3	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−300%

8−9
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−150%

5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Battlefield 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Battlefield 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+0%

10−11

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	0−1	0−1
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how 8700M GT and Iris Plus Graphics 645 compete in popular games:

Iris Plus Graphics 645 is 2500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics 645 is 350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Iris Plus Graphics 645 is ahead in 29 tests (48%)
there's a draw in 32 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.32	4.45
Recency	1 June 2007	7 October 2019
Chip lithography	80 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	29 Watt	15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 645 has a 1290.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 93.3% lower power consumption.

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.