Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs Quadro FX 1300

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV38Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date9 August 2004 (20 years ago)3 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed350 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors135 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate2.800336.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video6x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 3 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 230 Watt

FX 1300 has 318.2% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1300 and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
Quadro FX 1300
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.