GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs Quadro FX 1300
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro FX 1300 with GeForce FX 5600 Ultra, including specs and performance data.
FX 1300 outperforms FX 5600 Ultra by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1479 | 1500 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.11 | no data |
| Architecture | Rankine (2003−2005) | Rankine (2003−2005) |
| GPU code name | NV38 | NV31 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 August 2004 (20 years ago) | 17 March 2003 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
FX 1300 and FX 5600 Ultra have a nearly equal value for money.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 135 million | 80 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 2.800 | 1.600 |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Length | 241 mm | 191 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 275 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 17.6 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.5 (2.1) |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.08 | 0.04 |
| Recency | 9 August 2004 | 17 March 2003 |
FX 1300 has a 100% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.
The Quadro FX 1300 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro FX 1300 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5600 Ultra is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
