GRID M3-3020 vs Quadro 6000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro 6000 and GRID M3-3020, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
M3-3020 outperforms 6000 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 615 | 587 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.07 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.42 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Maxwell (2014−2017) |
| GPU code name | GF100 | GM107 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 December 2010 (14 years ago) | 18 May 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,399 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 448 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1306 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.028 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 747 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 5.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.40 | 7.03 |
| Recency | 10 December 2010 | 18 May 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Quadro 6000 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
GRID M3-3020, on the other hand, has a 9.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro 6000 and GRID M3-3020.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
