Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Quadro 4000

#ad 
Buy
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000 Mac Edition Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000 SDI Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy
Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 4000 with Radeon RX 6700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 4000
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 142 Watt
3.30

RX 6700 XT outperforms 4000 by a whopping 1245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking72360
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1956.17
Power efficiency1.8415.31
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF100Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 November 2010 (14 years ago)3 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6700 XT has 29463% better value for money than Quadro 4000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562560
Core clock speed475 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate15.20413.0
Floating-point processing power0.4864 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs32160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed702 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth89.86 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 4000 3.30
RX 6700 XT 44.38
+1245%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 4000 1475
RX 6700 XT 19829
+1244%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−1390%
149
+1390%
1440p6−7
−1267%
82
+1267%
4K3−4
−1467%
47
+1467%

Cost per frame, $

1080p119.90
−3630%
3.21
+3630%
1440p199.83
−3321%
5.84
+3321%
4K399.67
−3822%
10.19
+3822%
  • RX 6700 XT has 3630% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT has 3321% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT has 3822% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 349
+0%
349
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 119
+0%
119
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 170
+0%
170
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 347
+0%
347
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 178
+0%
178
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 224
+0%
224
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 128
+0%
128
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 206
+0%
206
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+0%
90
+0%
Dota 2 175
+0%
175
+0%
Far Cry 5 169
+0%
169
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 200
+0%
200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 161
+0%
161
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 99
+0%
99
+0%
Metro Exodus 119
+0%
119
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223
+0%
223
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85
+0%
85
+0%
Dota 2 139
+0%
139
+0%
Far Cry 5 159
+0%
159
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 74
+0%
74
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127
+0%
127
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 102
+0%
102
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 53
+0%
53
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 102
+0%
102
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 71
+0%
71
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 29
+0%
29
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how Quadro 4000 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 1390% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 1267% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 1467% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.30 44.38
Recency 2 November 2010 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 230 Watt

Quadro 4000 has 62% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 1244.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Quadro 4000
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
FirePro W4100 FirePro W4100
RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT
vs
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
Tesla M1060 Tesla M1060
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
FX 1000 Quadro FX 1000
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
HD Graphics P3000 HD Graphics P3000
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
Radeon 620 Radeon 620
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
T400 Mobile T400 Mobile
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
Arc A310 Arc A310
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 190 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7243 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 4000 or Radeon RX 6700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.