HD Graphics 4000 vs Quadro FX 380 LP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
330 350 370 370 LP 380 380 LP
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2000 3000 4000 4200 4400 4600 5000 5300 5500 5600 6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 380 LP with HD Graphics 4000, including specs and performance data.

FX 380 LP
2009, $169
512 MB GDDR3, 28 Watt
0.34

HD Graphics 4000 outperforms 380 LP by a whopping 221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX 380 LP FX 380 LP
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13551132
Place by popularitynot in top-10062
Power efficiency0.941.87
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameGT218Ivy Bridge GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 December 2009 (16 years ago)14 May 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16128
Core clock speed550 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors260 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate4.40016.00
Floating-point processing power0.044 TFLOPS0.256 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs816
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.0
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A+
CUDA1.2-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 380 LP 0.34
HD Graphics 4000 1.09
+221%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 380 LP 144
Samples: 60
HD Graphics 4000 454
+215%
Samples: 47356

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p3−4
−300%
12
+300%
Full HD3−4
−267%
11
+267%

Cost per frame, $

1080p56.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21
+0%
21
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how FX 380 LP and HD Graphics 4000 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 4000 is 300% faster in 900p
  • HD Graphics 4000 is 267% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 39 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.34 1.09
Recency 1 December 2009 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 22 nm

HD Graphics 4000 has a 221% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 82% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 380 LP in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 380 LP is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 380 LP Quadro FX 380 LP
vs
FirePro 2270 FirePro 2270
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
vs
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
FX 380 LP Quadro FX 380 LP
vs
FX 580 Quadro FX 580
Quadro 4000 NVIDIA Quadro 4000
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
Quadro 4000 NVIDIA Quadro 4000
vs
RTX 3080 12 GB RTX 3080 12 GB
Quadro 4000 NVIDIA Quadro 4000
vs
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Quadro 4000 NVIDIA Quadro 4000
vs
Instinct MI300A Instinct MI300A
Quadro 4000 NVIDIA Quadro 4000
vs
Instinct MI308X Instinct MI308X
FX 380 LP NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
vs
GTX 750 v2 GTX 750 v2
FX 380 LP NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
vs
Tesla X2070 Tesla X2070
FX 380 LP NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
vs
Tesla X2090 Tesla X2090
FX 380 LP NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
vs
256 DDR GeForce 256 DDR
FX 380 LP NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
vs
FX 1000 FX 1000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 6085 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 380 LP or HD Graphics 4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.