Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Quadro 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000 Mac Edition Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000 SDI Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 6000 with Radeon RX 6700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 6000
2010
6 GB GDDR5, 204 Watt
6.84

RX 6700 XT outperforms 6000 by a whopping 637% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking56454
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1756.64
Power efficiency2.3515.39
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF100Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 December 2010 (14 years ago)3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,399 $479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6700 XT has 33218% better value for money than Quadro 6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482560
Core clock speed574 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14413.0
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs56160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed747 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/s384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 6000 6.84
RX 6700 XT 50.41
+637%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 6000 2690
RX 6700 XT 19835
+637%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
−750%
153
+750%
1440p10−12
−710%
81
+710%
4K6−7
−683%
47
+683%

Cost per frame, $

1080p244.39
−7706%
3.13
+7706%
1440p439.90
−7339%
5.91
+7339%
4K733.17
−7094%
10.19
+7094%
  • RX 6700 XT has 7706% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT has 7339% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT has 7094% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 232
+0%
232
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 159
+0%
159
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 119
+0%
119
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 169
+0%
169
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 123
+0%
123
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 178
+0%
178
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 224
+0%
224
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 101
+0%
101
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+0%
90
+0%
Dota 2 175
+0%
175
+0%
Far Cry 5 169
+0%
169
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 200
+0%
200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 161
+0%
161
+0%
Metro Exodus 119
+0%
119
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223
+0%
223
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85
+0%
85
+0%
Dota 2 139
+0%
139
+0%
Far Cry 5 159
+0%
159
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127
+0%
127
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 102
+0%
102
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 102
+0%
102
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 71
+0%
71
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how Quadro 6000 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 750% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 710% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 683% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.84 50.41
Recency 10 December 2010 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 230 Watt

Quadro 6000 has 12.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 637% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Quadro 6000
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
GRID K2 GRID K2
RTX 4080 NVIDIA RTX 4080
vs
Quadro 600 600
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
vs
Quadro 600 600
GTX 860M NVIDIA GTX 860M
vs
Quadro 6000 6000
Iris Pro Graphics 580 Intel Pro Graphics 580
vs
Quadro 6000 6000
K2000D Quadro K2000D
vs
Quadro 6000 6000
HD 7850M AMD HD 7850M
vs
Quadro 4000 4000
GT 630M NVIDIA GT 630M
vs
Quadro 4000 4000
NVS 140M NVIDIA NVS 140M
vs
Quadro 4000 4000
GT 635 OEM NVIDIA GT 635 OEM
vs
Quadro 4000 4000
FX 5200 LE NVIDIA FX 5200 LE
vs
Quadro 4000 4000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 40 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7047 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 6000 or Radeon RX 6700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.