Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Quadro 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 4000 Mac Edition 5000 5000 SDI 6000 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300 XT 6400 6500 XT 6600 6600 LE 6600 XT 6650 XT 6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT 6800 6800 3456SP 6800 XT 6850 XT 6900 6900 XT 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 4000 with Radeon RX 6650 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 4000
2010, $1,199
2 GB GDDR5, 142 Watt
3.52

6650 XT outperforms 4000 by a whopping 1065% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking768108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0858.32
Power efficiency1.9017.89
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF100Navi 23
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 November 2010 (15 years ago)10 May 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6650 XT has 72800% better value for money than Quadro 4000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speed475 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2635 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate15.20337.3
Floating-point processing power0.4864 TFLOPS10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs32128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed702 MHz2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth89.86 GB/s280.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 4000 3.52
RX 6650 XT 41.01
+1065%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 4000 1475
Samples: 2268
RX 6650 XT 17160
+1063%
Samples: 4410

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−1280%
138
+1280%
1440p5−6
−1280%
69
+1280%
4K3−4
−1100%
36
+1100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p119.90
−4047%
2.89
+4047%
1440p239.80
−4047%
5.78
+4047%
4K399.67
−3506%
11.08
+3506%
  • RX 6650 XT has 4047% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT has 4047% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT has 3506% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 346
+0%
346
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 342
+0%
342
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 108
+0%
108
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 198
+0%
198
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 181
+0%
181
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+0%
88
+0%
Dota 2 171
+0%
171
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 163
+0%
163
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180
+0%
180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 102
+0%
102
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+0%
182
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Dota 2 136
+0%
136
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 107
+0%
107
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 108
+0%
108
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+0%
77
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+0%
56
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how Quadro 4000 and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 1280% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 1280% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 1100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.52 41.01
Recency 2 November 2010 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 176 Watt

Quadro 4000 has 23.9% lower power consumption.

RX 6650 XT, on the other hand, has a 1065.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Quadro 4000
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
FirePro W4100 FirePro W4100
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
FX 5200 Ultra 5200 Ultra
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
FX 1700 1700
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
K6000 SDI K6000 SDI
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
GeForce 9200 9200
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh 2070 Max-Q Refresh
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
UHD Graphics 32EU 32EU
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
RTX 5880 Ada Generation 5880 Ada Generation
NVS 295 NVIDIA NVS 295
vs
GRID K260Q K260Q
NVS 295 NVIDIA NVS 295
vs
NVS 280 PCIe 280 PCIe
NVS 295 NVIDIA NVS 295
vs
Quadro 4100 4100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 198 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 4009 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 4000 or Radeon RX 6650 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.