Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Quadro 2000M
2.01

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Quadro 2000M by 32% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking839771
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Value for money0.250.79
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Gen. 9.5 (2017)
GPU code nameFermiKaby-Lake-Refresh GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years old)1 September 2017 (6 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$46.56 no data
Current price$135 (2.9x MSRP)$706
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 620 has 216% better value for money than Quadro 2000M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19224
Core clock speed550 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6027.60
Floating-point performance422.4 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro 2000M and UHD Graphics 620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.1.103
CUDA2.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 2000M 2.01
UHD Graphics 620 2.66
+32.3%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Quadro 2000M by 32% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 2000M 781
UHD Graphics 620 1030
+31.9%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Quadro 2000M by 32% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro 2000M 6634
UHD Graphics 620 7330
+10.5%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Quadro 2000M by 10% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro 2000M 1261
UHD Graphics 620 1744
+38.3%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms Quadro 2000M by 38% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD38
+192%
13
−192%
1440p12−14
−33.3%
16
+33.3%
4K6−7
−33.3%
8
+33.3%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−300%
8
+300%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−500%
6
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12
+200%
Hitman 3 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+33.3%
6
−33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−500%
6
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−400%
5
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hitman 3 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−33.3%
4
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6
+20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−500%
6
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3
−66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

This is how Quadro 2000M and UHD Graphics 620 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Quadro 2000M is 192% faster than UHD Graphics 620

1440p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 33.3% faster than Quadro 2000M

4K resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 33.3% faster than Quadro 2000M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro 2000M is 66.7% faster than the UHD Graphics 620.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 620 is 600% faster than the Quadro 2000M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro 2000M is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • UHD Graphics 620 is ahead in 35 tests (73%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (23%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.01 2.66
Recency 22 February 2011 1 September 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

The UHD Graphics 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 2000M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 620 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Quadro 2000M
Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 57 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro 2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 3682 votes

Rate Intel UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.