NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs K620M
Comparison of Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
17.6 GTexel / s
17.98 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
28.8 GB / s
14.4 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Quadro 2000M 2.96 +86.2%
Quadro K620M 1.59
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Quadro 2000M 1261
Quadro K620M 2434 +93%
3DMark Vantage Performance
Quadro 2000M 6634
Quadro K620M 7880 +18.8%
Quadro 2000M 1034 +11.8%
Quadro K620M 925
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s −240.7%
92 Mh/s +240.7%
Let's see how good Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
86.2% faster (about 2 times) in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (28.8 vs 14.4 GB/s)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K620M
Much newer (1 March 2015 vs 22 February 2011)
More pipelines (384 vs 192)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)
Less power hungry (30 vs 55 watts)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
OpenCL (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
3D Vision Surround
So, Quadro 2000M or K620M?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro 2000M.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.