ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 vs Quadro 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2000 2000D 4000 4000 Mac Edition 4100 5000 5000 SDI 6000 6000 SDI 7000
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 2000 with Mobility Radeon HD 5850, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 2000
2010, $599
1 GB GDDR5, 62 Watt
2.25
+30.1%

2000 outperforms Mobility HD 5850 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
ATI Mobility HD 5850 Mobility HD 5850

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking898970
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.804.45
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF106Broadway
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 December 2010 (14 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192800
Core clock speed625 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate20.0020.00
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3240
L1 Cache256 KB80 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length178 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24−27
+26.3%
19
−26.3%
Full HD30−35
+20%
25
−20%

Cost per frame, $

1080p19.97no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Quadro 2000 and ATI Mobility HD 5850 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro 2000 is 26% faster in 900p
  • Quadro 2000 is 20% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.25 1.73
Recency 24 December 2010 7 January 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 30 Watt

Quadro 2000 has a 30.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

ATI Mobility HD 5850, on the other hand, has 106.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 2000 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5850 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
Quadro 2000D Quadro 2000D
ATI Mobility HD 5850 Mobility Radeon HD 5850
vs
GeForce 920M GeForce 920M
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
FirePro W2100 FirePro W2100
ATI Rage 128 GL Rage 128 GL
vs
GeForce4 MX 440 Mac Edition MX 440 Mac Edition
ATI Rage 128 GL PCI Rage 128 GL PCI
vs
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Lake-U Xe Graphics G1
ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra GL Rage 128 PRO Ultra GL
vs
GTX 750 Ti OEM GTX 750 Ti OEM
ATI Rage XL Rage XL
vs
RTX 2070 Super RTX 2070 Super
ATI Rage XL Rage XL
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
HD 8350 OEM HD 8350 OEM
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
RX 5700 RX 5700
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
RTX 8100 RTX 8100
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Radeon HD 4670
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4650 Radeon HD 4650

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 335 votes

Rate Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 2000 or Mobility Radeon HD 5850, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.