Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs Quadro 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 2000 with Mobility Radeon HD 5650, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 2000
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 62 Watt
2.45
+78.8%

Quadro 2000 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5650 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking799971
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.41no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF106Madison Pro
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 December 2010 (13 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data
Current price$141 (0.2x MSRP)$24

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192400
Core clock speed625 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speedno data650 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt15-19 Watt
Texture fill rate20.009.000
Floating-point performance480.0 gflops360.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro 2000 and Mobility Radeon HD 5650 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length178 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2600 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24−27
+60%
15
−60%
Full HD30−35
+76.5%
17
−76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Hitman 3 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Hitman 3 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how Quadro 2000 and ATI Mobility HD 5650 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro 2000 is 60% faster in 900p
  • Quadro 2000 is 76% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.45 1.37
Recency 24 December 2010 7 January 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 15 Watt

The Quadro 2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 2000 is a workstation card while Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 290 votes

Rate Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 247 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.