ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Quadro 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
600 2000 2000D 4000 4000 Mac Edition 5000 6000 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2070 Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
550v 560v 565v 4650 4670 4670 Mac Edition 5165

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 600 with Mobility Radeon HD 4670, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 600
2010, $179
1 GB DDR3, 40 Watt
1.24
+11.7%

600 outperforms Mobility HD 4670 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Mobility HD 4670

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10751118
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.392.44
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF108M96
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 December 2010 (14 years ago)9 January 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96320
Core clock speed640 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors585 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate10.2421.60
Floating-point processing power0.2458 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1632
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.24 1.11
Recency 13 December 2010 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro 600 has a 11.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 4670, on the other hand, has 14.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 600 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 600
Quadro 600
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Mobility Radeon HD 4670
vs
8800M GTX GeForce 8800M GTX
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
ATI Rage XL ATI Rage XL
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Quadro 2000 NVIDIA Quadro 2000
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5850 Radeon HD 5850
Quadro 2000 NVIDIA Quadro 2000
vs
HD 8350 OEM HD 8350 OEM
Quadro 2000 NVIDIA Quadro 2000
vs
RX 5700 RX 5700
Quadro 2000 NVIDIA Quadro 2000
vs
RTX 8100 RTX 8100
Quadro 600 NVIDIA Quadro 600
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4650 Radeon HD 4650
Quadro 600 NVIDIA Quadro 600
vs
ATI X700 PRO AGP Radeon X700 PRO AGP
Quadro 600 NVIDIA Quadro 600
vs
7600 GT GeForce 7600 GT
Quadro 600 NVIDIA Quadro 600
vs
GT 120M Mac Edition GT 120M Mac Edition
Quadro 600 NVIDIA Quadro 600
vs
FX 5700 Engineering Sample FX 5700 Engineering Sample

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 457 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 600 or Mobility Radeon HD 4670, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.