ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE vs Playstation 3 RSX 28nm

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameRSX-D5305LR420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2013 (11 years ago)27 April 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed550 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors302 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.203.400
ROPs88
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A9.0b (9_2)
OpenGLES 1.12.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2013 27 April 2005
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

Playstation 3 RSX 28nm has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 3 RSX 28nm and All-In-Wonder X800 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Playstation 3 RSX 28nm is a notebook card while All-In-Wonder X800 SE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 28nm
Playstation 3 RSX 28nm
ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE
All-In-Wonder X800 SE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 9 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX 28nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.