Arctic Sound-M vs PG506-232

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGA100Arctic Sound
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35848192
Core clock speed930 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1440 MHzno data
Number of transistors54,200 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate322.6230.4
Floating-point processing power10.32 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs224256
Tensor Cores224no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth933.1 GB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader ModelN/A6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 500 Watt

PG506-232 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 203% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between PG506-232 and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA PG506-232
PG506-232
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-232 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.