Arc A310 vs PG506-232

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.25
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA100DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584768
Core clock speed930 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1440 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate322.664.00
Floating-point processing power10.32 TFLOPS3.072 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs22432
Tensor Cores22496
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth933.1 GB/s124.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2021 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 75 Watt

PG506-232 has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between PG506-232 and Arc A310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that PG506-232 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A310 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA PG506-232
PG506-232
Intel Arc A310
Arc A310

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-232 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 249 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.