Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking805not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.12no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 November 2015 (9 years ago)July 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×24096
Core clock speed902 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06 ×2747.5
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×247.84 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×2128
TMUs32 ×2256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length198 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×232 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×2644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 300 Watt

NVS 810 has 341.2% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 810 and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.