Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GRID M40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking706not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.08no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)July 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096
Core clock speed1033 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06747.5
Floating-point processing power0.7933 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs32256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

GRID M40 has 500% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID M40 and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 8 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M40 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.