Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 810 with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, including specs and performance data.

NVS 810
2015
2 GB DDR3, 68 Watt
2.74

Pro Graphics P6300 outperforms NVS 810 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking850762
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.1019.38
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameGM107Broadwell GT3e
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 November 2015 (10 years ago)5 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×2384
Core clock speed902 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06 ×238.40
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×20.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×26
TMUs32 ×248
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.80
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 810 2.74
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 3.78
+38%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 810 1146
Samples: 32
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1582
+38%
Samples: 20

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.74 3.78
Recency 4 November 2015 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 15 Watt

NVS 810 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300, on the other hand, has a 38% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 353.3% lower power consumption.

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 810 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or Iris Pro Graphics P6300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.