GeForce RTX 5090 D vs NVS 5200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 5200M with GeForce RTX 5090 D, including specs and performance data.

NVS 5200M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 25 Watt
1.27

RTX 5090 D outperforms NVS 5200M by a whopping 7766% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10482
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.6012.30
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGF117GB202
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)30 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9621760
Core clock speed625 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors585 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate10.001,637
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs4176
TMUs16680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXMPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 5200M 1.27
RTX 5090 D 99.90
+7766%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 5200M 508
RTX 5090 D 40054
+7785%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−7627%
850−900
+7627%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Fortnite 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−7678%
700−750
+7678%
Valorant 30−35
−7627%
2550−2600
+7627%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−7757%
2200−2250
+7757%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Dota 2 16−18
−7713%
1250−1300
+7713%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Fortnite 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−7678%
700−750
+7678%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Valorant 30−35
−7627%
2550−2600
+7627%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Dota 2 16−18
−7713%
1250−1300
+7713%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−7678%
700−750
+7678%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Valorant 30−35
−7627%
2550−2600
+7627%
Fortnite 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
Valorant 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Fortnite 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7567%
1150−1200
+7567%
Valorant 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Fortnite 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

This is how NVS 5200M and RTX 5090 D compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 D is 7627% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 99.90
Recency 1 June 2012 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 575 Watt

NVS 5200M has 2200% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090 D, on the other hand, has a 7766.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 5200M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 5200M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5090 D is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5200M
NVS 5200M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D
GeForce RTX 5090 D

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5
154 votes

Rate NVS 5200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4
462 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 5200M or GeForce RTX 5090 D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.