HD Graphics 530 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 505 HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 515 HD Graphics 520 HD Graphics 530

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with HD Graphics 530, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.56
+1614%

TITAN V outperforms HD Graphics 530 by a whopping 1614% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V TITAN V
HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 530

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking85831
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Power efficiency12.2111.88
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGV100Skylake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120192
Core clock speed1200 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate465.622.80
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS0.3648 TFLOPS
ROPs963
TMUs32024
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount12 GB64 GB
Memory bus width3072 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed848 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan++
CUDA7.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 44.56
+1614%
HD Graphics 530 2.60

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+1611%
HD Graphics 530 1001

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD230−240
+1543%
14
−1543%
1440p152
+1800%
8−9
−1800%
4K82
+1071%
7
−1071%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.04no data
1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6
+0%
6
+0%
Fortnite 20
+0%
20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
+0%
3
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how TITAN V and HD Graphics 530 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 1543% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 1800% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 1071% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.56 2.60
Recency 7 December 2017 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

TITAN V has a 1613.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 530, on the other hand, has a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 530 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while HD Graphics 530 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
Intel HD Graphics 530
HD Graphics 530
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 530
vs
GeForce 830M GeForce 830M
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
RTX 4010 GeForce RTX 4010
vs
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
GTX 1650 TU106 GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G1
vs
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
GTX 1660 Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
Arc A580 Arc A580
vs
TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Arc Pro A40 Arc Pro A40
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
vs
Tesla P100 SXM2 Tesla P100 SXM2
PRO V710 Radeon PRO V710
vs
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
GeForce MX250 GeForce MX250
vs
R7 M270DX Radeon R7 M270DX
RTX 4090 Mobile GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
vs
R7 M270DX Radeon R7 M270DX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3310 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1604 votes

Rate HD Graphics 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or HD Graphics 530, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.