GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps vs GTX 650 Ti
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 580 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.11 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.10 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | GK106 | GP104 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 20 April 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1733 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,540 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 59.39 | 277.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.425 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 64 |
| TMUs | 64 | 160 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 1376 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 352.3 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Multi monitor support | 4 Displays | no data |
| HDMI | + | + |
| HDCP | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | - |
| 3D Gaming | + | - |
| 3D Vision | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 October 2012 | 20 April 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 180 Watt |
GTX 650 Ti has 63.6% lower power consumption.
GTX 1080 11Gbps, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
