FirePro M3900 vs NVS 5200M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking981not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.09no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN13M-NSSeymour XT
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2012 (11 years ago)13 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$139 $42

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96160
Core clock speed625 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors585 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate10.006.000
Floating-point performance258.0 gflops240 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on NVS 5200M and FirePro M3900 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfaceMXMPCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorno datachip-down

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s14 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinityno data+

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 1 June 2012 13 April 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 20 Watt

We couldn't decide between NVS 5200M and FirePro M3900. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5200M
NVS 5200M
AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 132 votes

Rate NVS 5200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.