Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVS 510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID K1 GRID K100 GRID K120Q GRID K160Q GRID K340 NVS 510 NVS 1000 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 5600 OEM Radeon RX 5600 XT Radeon RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 510 with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

NVS 510
2012
2 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
1.75

RX 5700 XT outperforms NVS 510 by a whopping 2290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

NVS 510 NVS 510
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking93194
Place by popularitynot in top-10041
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1146.06
Power efficiency3.5113.05
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 5700 XT has 41773% better value for money than NVS 510.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922560
Core clock speed797 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1905 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate12.75304.8
Floating-point processing power0.306 TFLOPS9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length160 mm272 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 510 1.75
RX 5700 XT 41.82
+2290%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 510 688
RX 5700 XT 16455
+2292%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−2480%
129
+2480%
1440p3−4
−2500%
78
+2500%
4K2−3
−2350%
49
+2350%

Cost per frame, $

1080p89.80
−2803%
3.09
+2803%
1440p149.67
−2826%
5.12
+2826%
4K224.50
−2657%
8.14
+2657%
  • RX 5700 XT has 2803% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT has 2826% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 5700 XT has 2657% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 175
+0%
175
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 133
+0%
133
+0%
Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 76
+0%
76
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Far Cry 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 223
+0%
223
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 155
+0%
155
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 177
+0%
177
+0%
Valorant 313
+0%
313
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 78
+0%
78
+0%
Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 64
+0%
64
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+0%
75
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Fortnite 179
+0%
179
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 154
+0%
154
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 97
+0%
97
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 166
+0%
166
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+0%
154
+0%
Valorant 294
+0%
294
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 57
+0%
57
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+0%
67
+0%
Dota 2 103
+0%
103
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 148
+0%
148
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 139
+0%
139
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93
+0%
93
+0%
Valorant 159
+0%
159
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 143
+0%
143
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 286
+0%
286
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 119
+0%
119
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 72
+0%
72
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 93
+0%
93
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%
Valorant 242
+0%
242
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8
+0%
8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
+0%
53
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+0%
45
+0%

This is how NVS 510 and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 2480% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT is 2500% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 XT is 2350% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.75 41.82
Recency 23 October 2012 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

NVS 510 has 542.9% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 2289.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 510 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 510 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA NVS 510
NVS 510
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
FX 4700 X2 Quadro FX 4700 X2
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
Radeon VII Radeon VII
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
GRID K140Q GRID K140Q
Radeon 630 Radeon 630
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
vs
A30X A30X
R7 240 Radeon R7 240
vs
HD 8370D IGP HD 8370D IGP
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
vs
GeForce3 GeForce3
R9 390 Radeon R9 390
vs
GT 640 GT 640
Graphics 448SP Radeon Graphics 448SP
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
RX 580 2048SP RX 580 2048SP
ATI HD 3870 X2 Radeon HD 3870 X2
vs
GTX 750 Ti GTX 750 Ti
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
vs
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU Pro 18-Core GPU
HD Graphics 520 HD Graphics 520
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB RTX 3060 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 60 votes

Rate NVS 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8396 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 510 or Radeon RX 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.