GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs Tesla M2070

Place in performance ranking	598	63
Place by popularity	not in top-100	93
Value for money	0.06	46.49
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GF100	Turing TU104
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	25 July 2011 (12 years old)	2 July 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,099	$499
Current price	$4064 (1.3x MSRP)	$261 (0.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super has 77383% better value for money than Tesla M2070.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	2560
Core clock speed	574 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	215 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.14	283.2
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	248 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3132 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	150.3 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.0	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	12−14 −1025%	135 +1025%
1440p	8−9 −950%	84 +950%
4K	5−6 −1000%	55 +1000%

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	4.87	47.12
Recency	25 July 2011	2 July 2019
Cost	$3099	$499
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	215 Watt