GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs NVS 510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID K1 GRID K100 GRID K120Q GRID K160Q GRID K340 NVS 510 NVS 1000 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 510 with GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

NVS 510
2012
2 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
1.73

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q outperforms NVS 510 by a whopping 1879% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

NVS 510 NVS 510
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking930146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency3.5330.59
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK107TU104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922560
Core clock speed797 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1155 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate12.75184.8
Floating-point processing power0.306 TFLOPS5.914 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length160 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s352.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA3.07.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 510 1.73
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 34.24
+1879%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 510 689
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 13630
+1878%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−1980%
104
+1980%
1440p3−4
−2233%
70
+2233%
4K2−3
−2350%
49
+2350%

Cost per frame, $

1080p89.80no data
1440p149.67no data
4K224.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 157
+0%
157
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+0%
28
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
+0%
125
+0%
Metro Exodus 80
+0%
80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 51
+0%
51
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 94
+0%
94
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Dota 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Valorant 136
+0%
136
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
World of Tanks 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+0%
76
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 75
+0%
75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 100
+0%
100
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 73
+0%
73
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
+0%
73
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21
+0%
21
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+0%
73
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 103
+0%
103
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 51
+0%
51
+0%

This is how NVS 510 and RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 1980% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 2233% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 2350% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.73 34.24
Recency 23 October 2012 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

NVS 510 has 128.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 1879.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 510 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 510 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA NVS 510
NVS 510
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
FX 4700 X2 Quadro FX 4700 X2
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
vs
GTX 1080 Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
GRID K140Q GRID K140Q
K5000 SYNC Quadro K5000 SYNC
vs
Playstation 5 GPU Playstation 5 GPU
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
vs
RTX 2060 12 GB GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
9300 SE GeForce 9300 SE
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
R7 240 OEM Radeon R7 240 OEM
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
Quadro K500M Quadro K500M
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
GTX 680MX Mac Edition GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
RX 570G Radeon RX 570G

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 60 votes

Rate NVS 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 504 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.